Skip Navigation

2012 Winter Issue 6 (February 17, 2012)

Carls petition on behalf of jailed transgender woman

February 17, 2012
By Noelani Kirschner

Dedicated activism can stem from a wide range of circumstances, but none so much as witnessing true injustice.

Over the summer, Heather Yang ’12 heard a story from a friend that made her blood boil and changed her perspective on Minnesota’s legal system.

“My friend told me about Chrishaun ‘CeCe’ McDonald, a black transwoman, [who] was walking to Cub Foods one night when drunk white supremacists hurled racist comments at her, and then violently attacked her,” Yang said.

“Ms. McDonald acted in [self]-defense, and as a result a man with a swastika tattoo passed away.”

The incident happened in Minneapolis. Normally, in the state of Minnesota, if a woman kills an attacker in order to protect herself, charges of manslaughter are dropped, and the woman gets to walk away.

Yet McDonald is still facing trial and a lengthy jail sentencing, which is unheard of for other, white women who have involuntarily committed manslaughter in similar acts of self-defense.

“Ms. McDonald is facing an overly aggressive prosecution that other white, non-transwomen have not had to deal with,” Yang said. “It is such an obvious case of racism and transphobia that I was really surprised that it hadn’t been resolved already and that Ms. McDonald is still facing charges.”

The injustice of McDonald’s case prompted Yang to take action. With a group of about 15 other Carleton students, she began to conduct a series of calls to Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman, who is trying the case. Freeman has a record of dropped charges for cases involving white females but is refusing to do so for McDonald.

“We called Mr. Freeman’s office to ask that he treat Ms. McDonald’s case exactly as he would for a white person, which would be to drop the charges against her, as he has done in many other cases,” Yang said.

The students’ dedication to vocalizing the injustice of the case did not go unnoticed.

“The call-in had a noticeable impact on the Hennepin County Attorney’s office, whereby they initially transferred calls to Freeman, but then as more calls came through, they started taking names and numbers,” Yang said.

“After a day’s worth of calls, they resorted to a stock message and did not take messages unless specifically asked. Even then, they ‘handwrote’ the messages and only transferred to voicemail box if specifically requested.”

The flood of students’ opinion had the desired effect of a noticeable public outcry, but, Yang said, there is still much more work to be done.

McDonald’s next trial will be on April 30, as was decided at her last hearing on Dec. 20. In the meantime, Yang encourages more students to take action and let Freeman know that his approach to the case is unfair.

“The ideal outcome would be for the Hennepin County attorney to realize the strongly racist and transphobic misjudgment in this case,” she said. “Ideally, Attorney Freeman will publicly apologize to Ms. McDonald and drop the charges against her.”

To get involved, Yang suggests making calls to the office or signing a petition.

“Call Michael Freeman’s secretary at 612-348-5540 and simply ask to please drop the charges against Chrishaun McDonald, or there’s also the petition at http://chn.ge/freecece,” she said.

“This is simple for us to do and what is necessary for the attorney to hear.”

Comments

  • February 20 2012 at 8:37 am
    Patrick

    Is it just me, or does this seem kind of sensationalist? The article seems to be largely in defense of a defendant in an ongoing legal case where we don't know the full details and the best we get from the article is "My friend told me . . . ". It promotes making judgments before knowing all of the facts of a case, and screams, through its use of words that attach 'trans' to negative words like phobia and racism, of society having huge societal problems towards transsexual or transgendered persons, raising the stakes of the issue that we know practically nothing about to an issue of prejudice on the side of the judge.

     This article could have been written ten times as objectively and is filled with language implying things that we do not know or that suggest things that don't focus on the point of the event like, "drunk white supremacists" or "with a swastika tattoo". It's important to be impartial when writing, especially as this piece isn't written as an opinion piece but as a news story. If you're writing news, write without bias and find out all of the facts. If you can't find out the facts, say, "we called the office of the attorney for comment but didn't receive a response."

Add a comment

Please login to comment.