Class of 2019 portfolios are due May 12, 2017*.
Class of 2020 portfolios are due May 11, 2018*.
*Students who will be studying abroad in spring term must submit their portfolios Friday of 7th week in winter term.
- Writing Portfolio Requirements
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Insider's Guide
- The Scoring Process
Help with Writing:
The quick answer: To satisfy the College’s graduation requirement.
A better answer is contained in this thought experiment:
Imagine that you are competing for something you really want—maybe a job, an internship, a scholarship, a promotion, a trip around the world—and as part of the application, you have to submit something you have written, a single sample of your best work. Think about what you would choose. Now think about what that particular sample says about you. How does it show your strengths? What does it leave out?
Now imagine that you are allowed to add one more piece to the sample. How does that second piece complement the first? Does it strengthen your case? In what ways? Would a third piece add even more? If you imagine a reader reviewing your materials, what examples of your work would be most effective in representing you—one piece? Two? Three or more? What variety does a reader need to evaluate your writing in connection with the larger goal you seek?
As you can see, a range of written work reveals much more about your writing than a single example. The writing portfolio is deliberately positioned at the sixth term, the point where students declare a major and prepare for methods courses, junior colloquia, senior seminars, and comps. The Carleton faculty want all students to be confident that they have the writing experience to be successful in the major. A portfolio of work completed during the first six terms gives faculty a good sense of a student’s readiness for advanced writing in the major.
Carleton’s writing-across-the-curriculum philosophy assumes that students will write in nearly every course on subjects and in forms that will vary according to discipline, level of the course, and professors’ goals for each course. To measure a student’s ability to manage various writing situations, we could ask students to demonstrate their writing proficiency in various ways:
- Students could submit the paper that got the best grade in any course.
- Students could choose the paper that they think was most successful.
- Students could collect all the papers from one WR course.
- All students could take a writing exam at a specific date.
The first two of these choices invite the same problems you saw in the story above: one specimen, no matter how excellent in the context of a course, does not fully represent a college writer’s abilities.
The third option resembles what Carleton students did for many years—the work in one course was assessed for writing proficiency by the instructor of that course. Over time, students told us that they were frustrated by this method. Even though writing was contextualized within a course, the writing may or may not have been representative of a student’s broader experience of writing in college. Furthermore, the criteria for passing the writing requirement seemed to vary, depending on the course, the kind of writing assigned, and the instructor’s expectations.
The fourth option makes little sense in an environment where writing is valued as a means of learning rather than a de-contextualized exercise. Besides, we feared that students would revolt, and we sympathized.
In 1999, the College received a grant to explore new ways to assess student writing. Faculty held workshops, invited speakers from other schools who were national experts on writing assessment, and examined several assessment methods. Given the nature of Carleton’s curriculum and the broad mastery of writing strategies our students are expected to achieve, the faculty decided that a portfolio of work collected at the end of the sixth term would accomplish several important goals. (See next section.)
With the generous cooperation of volunteers from the class of 2004, faculty read pilot portfolios in the summer of 2001, and all students who entered in 2001 or later have been required to submit a portfolio. Every June, about 35 readers gather shortly after Commencement to read portfolios from the class that just completed the sixth term.
- Students are in charge of choosing the writing they want faculty to evaluate.
- Students introduce their choices with a reflection on their experience as college writers and make an argument that the pieces in the portfolio document their writing achievements to date and their potential as writers in a major. This reflection is the only new writing required, and it offers students a chance to show how they can develop a persuasive argument from documentary evidence—their own writing for courses.
- A community sense of “good writing” at the sophomore level clarifies expectations of student work in advanced courses for both faculty and students.
- A portfolio provides the means of a) rewarding students who perform at an “exemplary” level via public recognition, and b) helping those students whose writing earns a “needs work” rating as they begin the junior year and the writing associated with the major.
- After learning about methods of assessing student writing, faculty talked together about writing skills needed across the curriculum. In so doing, they developed a structure for a portfolio that would speak to rhetorical tasks necessary to succeed in all majors.
- Now that they routinely read portfolios, faculty have learned that their own teaching is affected by familiarity with student work across the curriculum. Faculty seldom get a chance to read work they have not assigned, and a portfolio allows for an efficient means of appreciating Carleton students’ experience as college writers. Through this rich experience of reading student work, faculty calibrate their expectations in their own courses, often revising their assignments to reflect what they have learned from assignments written by colleagues.
Revision tells readers that writers care about their work and how it will be read. Some students worry that admitting to revision will mark them as poor writers who need to fix their writing before faculty can understand it. In some cases, that may be true. However, all writers benefit from revision, and no faculty reader will ever hold it against a writer that s/he took time to revise. Careful revision is a mark of careful thinking—and respect for readers.
Tips for Success:
- Keep all of your writing for courses, both in digital and hard copy form. If your laptop is stolen or damaged, you will be very glad you have a stash of writing on paper.
- Read your papers carefully and allow time to revise. At the very least, correct typos and other obvious errors. Readers will thank you.
- Choose papers that meet the criteria and also show variety. Try to avoid submitting a portfolio composed of three or four papers of similar structure.
- If you decide to use more than one paper from a single course, be sure to defend that choice in your reflective essay. Successful portfolios tend to show a range of writing styles and topics.
- If English is not your native language, consult an ESL tutor at the Writing Center for help in preparing your portfolio.
- Take time with your reflective essay, which is usually read first. Your job is to argue that you are a successful Carleton writer, ready to take on advanced work in your major. Your evidence will come from the papers in your portfolio. Take time to seek feedback on your essay from at least one reader before you submit your portfolio.
A few highlights:
The vast majority of Carleton students assemble a passing portfolio that shows their ability to write in several disciplines and in forms ranging from textual analysis to narrative to formal reports to laboratory procedures and more. Students are learning to produce the kind of writing that leads to success in college.
Writing at Carleton is truly across the curriculum. Portfolios (466) from the class of 2012 included assignments from 361 courses taught by 209 faculty members—that’s nearly 100% of the Carleton faculty teaching in any one year. (Courses such as History 110 and English 109 that have multiple sections are counted as one course.) Courses and faculty were distributed as follows:
- Arts & Literature
119 courses, 63 faculty
87 courses, 30 faculty
- Social Sciences
106 courses, 50 faculty
- Natural Sciences & Mathematics
48 courses, 56 faculty
(Totals do not include some courses taught on off-campus programs and a few transfer courses.)
As the scholarly literature on writing assessment predicts, the general quality of student writing is improving. Portfolios from previous years are always included in the scoring of a new class to measure consistency of evaluation. In most cases, evaluation is consistent indeed; however, a portfolio rated “exemplary” in 2002 would likely be rated as a high “pass” this year. We attribute the higher standard at the upper end of the range to better communication among faculty about effective teaching. Reading successful assignments written by colleagues offers faculty the chance to learn from one another. The result is a gradual improvement in the quality of assignments, which, in turn, helps engender better student writing for those improved assignments. We see a direct connection between faculty evaluation of portfolios, their subsequent teaching practices, and student learning. Overall, writing at Carleton is improving.
Each year, a relatively small percentage of students submit portfolios that are rated “needs work.” The reasons tend to cluster in these ways:
- The writer hurried through the submission process and did not take time to review papers for obvious errors and textual problems. See the “Insider’s Guide” for advice on preparing a solid portfolio and the Tips for Success above.
- The writer chose papers that were similar in structure or subject matter, even if they met the portfolio criteria. For example, a portfolio with two English papers and a Religion paper, all of which involve close reading of primary texts, would be strengthened by the addition of a social science or math/natural science paper to show breadth.
- The writer submitted two or more papers from the same course. This strategy exacerbates the problem noted in #2, above. We really do want students to demonstrate their writing across the curriculum.
- The writer shows difficulty with argument, citation practices, use of evidence, logical organization, or other rhetorical strategies. Individual help, perhaps connected to work underway in the following term, can be useful as writers continue in the major and approach comps.
- The writer has difficulty managing Standard American English. In some cases, writers are referred to Writing Center staff with expertise in teaching English as a second (or third or fourth) language for individual help.
In all cases, the Writing Program Director or another writing professional will work individually with students to agree on the problems, propose solutions, and resubmit the portfolio during the next term the writer is on campus.
Please see the FAQ for answers to routine questions. The folder you received during New Student Week contains detailed instructions and all of the relevant forms. If you no longer have that folder, the FAQ page supplies links to the forms.
You may contact Carol Rutz, Director of the Writing Program, who will be glad to advise you. You may also talk with your academic adviser, staff and tutors at the Write Place, professors who assign you writing, or your class dean. Finally, consider asking your RA to invite Carol Rutz to a Q&A session on your floor.